Comey’s testimony lacerated the president and laid the basis for Special Counsel Robert Mueller to investigate obstruction of justice. That and self-justification were his main goals, and he succeeded.
But Comey’s testimony was careful.
Here are some fair representations of it.
The best, I think, is the Wall Street Journal’s because it
- Puts Comey’s accusation against Trump in the headline
- Gives it the most prominent place on the front page without stretching it to World War III headline size
- Makes clear that Comey is saying how he “felt.” The WSJ is not taking a hard-news stance that he is correct or incorrect in that interpretation
The Chicago Tribune is fair, too. It gives the story more prominence (a perfectly reasonable decision) and puts the hard news in the subheader.
The headline merely says what we all know: he testified.
Here are two more, equally fair and tough.
Now, the New York Times.
The Times’ headline represents everything that is wrong with mainstream media.
It is an editorial without saying so.
Why? Because Comey did not testify that Trump tried to “sink” the inquiry. He was more careful, more lawyers, more “touchy-feely” about what he “felt” (which, of course, is entirely subjective and so cannot be refuted).
Comey did not say Trump tried to stop the inquiry.
He didn’t say Trump ordered him to do anything.
He didn’t report anything like obstruction of justice at the time, as he would have been required to do.
What he testified was that he felt pressured.
Comey may be exactly right–or not. We can make our own judgments, but we don’t know for sure.
His testimony was a lawyerly self-defense, designed to help himself and get revenge on Trump.
But he did not testify, under oath, that Trump “tried to sink” the investigation. That’s the NYT’s editorial spin.
Their interpretation may be exactly right, but it belongs on the editorial pages.
All the other stories above the fold are designed–and headlined–to reinforce the NYT’s editorial viewpoint.
Their headline should be hard news, and it should be accurate.
That would be a refreshing change.